The media and right-wing demagogues are attacking the independence of
the judiciary - and, by extension, the rule of law. An element among them
appears to be suggesting vigilante action against Gina Miller and those seeking
to uphold Parliamentary democracy.
What exactly is the Liberal Democrat leadership doing?
In the Witney by-election some activists claimed the party's pro-EU
message was concealed from literature to all voters. It certainly was
kept off centre stage while used heavily in targeted mailings.
Anecdotally, this strategy was electorally successful. Time will
tell whether similar strategies work in the much more pro-Remain territory of
Richmond Park.
But a Liberal party that seems finally to be agreed on the need for a
core vote does not seem to be using this golden opportunity to seize that
pro-EU territory. Nick Clegg - still a divisive figure - now appears to
support EU withdrawal if it means remaining in the single market. Other
Lib Dem MPs remain off-message, or would do if only the party were clear what
message it had.
There has been some lip service paid to welcoming the High Court
judgment - but nothing more. No Liberal vision of what an Article 50
negotiating position- nor a critique that in fact no sustainable position is
possible. Perhaps that is because of the
contradiction at the heart of that position.
While saying the Lib Dems are the 'party of remain', or saying 'the Lib
Dems are the party that wants the softest Brexit possible' are both coherent
positions, mixing them is not.
Surely the Liberal position is to trenchantly oppose mob rule?
That should mean both holding the Government to its commitment to respect
the independence of the judiciary, and to remind all that incitement is a
criminal offence - and that far-right extremists running papers or in the form
of UKIP leaders who incite violence face jail.
And on the subject of mob rule, the extremist-legitimising mindset of the
broader media must be challenged. After all, the Liberal Democrats will
hardly lose much coverage over such challenge.
For example, the party has for years taken a stance on the BBC that is
inherently conservative - even Conservative; the party does not challenge
broken British institutions, as a rule. Party figures have clamped down on any
challenge to the established orthodoxy. As the corporation has retrenched
into being part of Britain's problem, it as with other failing institutions
deserve robust challenge.
But back to the Lib Dems. It is pretty much the worst of all
possible worlds to pay lip service about being the voice of Remain voters while
at the same time leaving open the possibility of voting to trigger Article
50. The ordure heaped at Labour for its
muddled position demonstrates that if you want to become politically active to
fight EU withdrawal, it is not the party.
For the Lib Dems to do the same in that context is tactically stupid as
well as politically wrong.
The idea that you can fight your way back onto the political map with
only 8 MPs as part of a non-existent political orthodoxy is, to use a technical
term, bollocks. When fighting a must-win by-election against a plutocrat
fraudulently portraying himself as an independent outsider, it is doubly
bollocks. Even some activists are
threatening to take action to help the party hit this gaping open goal.
As nobody else will do it, it is up to Tim Farron to point out when this
system is rigged.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please note before commenting: Please read our comments policy (in the right-hand column of this blog). Comments that break this policy will not be accepted. In particular, we insist on everyone using their real, full name. If you have registered with Google using only your first name or a pseudonym, please put your full name at the end of your comment.
Oh, and we are not at home to Mr(s) Angry. Before you comment, read the post in full and any linked content, then pause, make a pot of tea, reflect, deliberate, make another pot of tea, then respond intelligently and courteously.